CATVA > EasyEntered answer:✅ Correct Answer: 3Related questions:CAT 2023 Slot 2Five jumbled up sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5), related to a topic, are given below. Four of them can be put together to form a coherent paragraph. Identify the odd sentence and key in the number of that sentence as your answer. Self-care particularly links to loneliness, behavioural problems, and negative academic outcomes. 2."Latchkey children" refers to children who routinely return home from school to empty homes and take care of themselves for extended periods of time. Although self-care generally points to negative outcomes, it is important to consider that the bulk of research has yet to track long-term consequences. In research and practice, the phrase "children in self-care" has come to replace latchkey in an effort to more accurately reflect the nature of their circumstances. Although parents might believe self-care would be beneficial for development, recent research has found quite the opposite. CAT 2019 Slot 2Five jumbled up sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5), related to a topic, are given below. Four of them can be put together to form a coherent paragraph. Identify the odd sentence and key in the number of that sentence as your answer. Ocean plastic is problematic for a number of reasons, but primarily because marine animals eat it. The largest numerical proportion of ocean plastic falls in small size fractions. Aside from clogging up the digestive tracts of marine life, plastic also tends to adsorb pollutants from the water column. Plastic in the oceans is arguably one of the most important and pervasive environmental problems today. Eating plastic has a number of negative consequences such as the retention of plastic particles in the gut for longer periods than normal food particles. CAT 2021 Slot 2Five jumbled up sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5), related to a topic, are given below. Four of them can be put together to form a coherent paragraph. Identify the odd sentence and key in the number of that sentence as your answer. The care with which philosophers examine arguments for and against forms of biotechnology makes this an excellent primer on formulating and assessing moral arguments. Although most people find at least some forms of genetic engineering disquieting, it is not easy to articulate why: what is wrong with re-engineering our nature? Breakthroughs in genetics present us with the promise that we will soon be able to prevent a host of debilitating diseases, and the predicament that our newfound genetic knowledge may enable us to enhance our genetic traits. To grapple with the ethics of enhancement, we need to confront questions that verge on theology, which is why modern philosophers and political theorists tend to shrink from them. One argument is that the drive for human perfection through genetics is objectionable as it represents a bid for mastery that fails to appreciate the gifts of human powers and achievements.